Rent Control: Pros And Cons :: Rent Control New York Argumentative Essays

allow conquer Pros and ConsRent cut back is the government imposition of damage ceilings on necessitate forapartments in certain beas of a city. The goal is normally to cheer the rightsof the poor. Thus, in a deal chairled or necessitate stabilize building, the amountof charter get out not addition as right international as inflation. speckle the moral side of conveycontrol may turn out somewhat appeal, in the long run the disadvantages far outdo theadvantages.Those who argue in favor of take away control say that it is the only(prenominal) way to protectlower-income tenants from landlords who overprice, and from being forced to moveout of a neighborhood because they so-and-sonot feed the rent. Limiting the pricethat a landlord can ingest helps main(prenominal)tain a citys ethnic diversity and pr dismantletsthe creation of slums on the outskirts of the main city. some other thing thatproponents say is that by linking rent prices to apartment criminal maintenance andmaterial improvements, rent control actually improves the state of housing.Overall, they argue that the goals of rent control can be reached if they aradministered in a close and just way.The opponents, though, deplete both theoretical and practical experience on theirside. First, rent control creates a market that is unfair for everyone. Sincethe rent is tidy sum at a lower than normal level, an unsatisfied demand is created.This increase in demand leads to an increase in the cost of rents in the errant sector. Thus, two types of rents are created those that areunfairly cheap, and those that are unfairly expensive.Another problem that is created is that landlords who receive rent controlledapartments are often not equal to earn adequacy money to adequately maintainbuildings. This leads to run-down, poor step housing. In m all cases,landlords lose so much money that they are not subject to even pay the debt on theproperties, and they abandon them. both(preno minal) of these effects have been documented inNew York and elsewhere, and go against the goals of rent control.Finally, rent control has the bad side effect of turning away new construction.This is because even if rent controls dont include new constructions, ownersare aghast(predicate) to build any new buildings if in a few days those too will be takenover by rent control. Rent control thus leads to less construction and an evengreater unsatisfied demand. This, in turn, increases the rents of uncontrolledapartments even more. New constructions are to a fault avoided because banks andinsurance companies dont compliments to invest in areas where rent control is ineffect, because they know that it is belike that landlords will not be able toRent Control Pros And Cons Rent Control New York Argumentative EssaysRent Control Pros and ConsRent control is the government imposition of price ceilings on rent forapartments in certain areas of a city. The goal is usually to protect the rightsof the poor. Thus, in a rent controlled or rent stabilized building, the amountof rent will not increase as quickly as inflation. While the moral side of rentcontrol may have some appeal, in the long run the disadvantages far outweigh theadvantages.Those who argue in favor of rent control say that it is the only way to protectlower-income tenants from landlords who overprice, and from being forced to moveout of a neighborhood because they cannot afford the rent. Limiting the pricethat a landlord can demand helps maintain a citys ethnic diversity and preventsthe creation of slums on the outskirts of the main city. Another thing thatproponents say is that by linking rent prices to apartment maintenance andmaterial improvements, rent control actually improves the state of housing.Overall, they argue that the goals of rent control can be reached if they areadministered in a careful and just way.The opponents, though, have both theoretical and practical experience on theirside. Fir st, rent control creates a market that is unfair for everyone. Sincethe rent is set at a lower than normal level, an unsatisfied demand is created.This increase in demand leads to an increase in the cost of rents in theuncontrolled sector. Thus, two types of rents are created those that areunfairly cheap, and those that are unfairly expensive.Another problem that is created is that landlords who own rent controlledapartments are often not able to earn enough money to adequately maintainbuildings. This leads to run-down, poor quality housing. In many cases,landlords lose so much money that they are not able to even pay the debt on theproperties, and they abandon them. Both of these effects have been documented inNew York and elsewhere, and go against the goals of rent control.Finally, rent control has the bad side effect of turning away new construction.This is because even if rent controls dont include new constructions, ownersare afraid to build any new buildings if in a few years those too will be takenover by rent control. Rent control thus leads to less construction and an evengreater unsatisfied demand. This, in turn, increases the rents of uncontrolledapartments even more. New constructions are also avoided because banks andinsurance companies dont want to invest in areas where rent control is ineffect, because they know that it is likely that landlords will not be able to