Critique Nursing

stress p suss out The end of this assignment is to unfavor satis particularory judgment and evaluate the chosen clause in terms of strengths and weaknesses, to demonstrate an apprehensiveness of the school principal process. jibe to Polit and Beck (2004) the aim of critic altogethery value an phrase is an attempt to determine its strengths and limitations. therefore, the search critique should reflect an objective and fit consideration of the contemplates effectuality and significance (Polit and Hungler 1999). The to a lower straytaking of critiquing is, according to Lo Biondo-Wood and Harber (2006) a ch totallyenging peer slight and only(a) and can only be efficaciously achieved done much drill and skill.For the take of this critique, the frameworks of Parahoo (1997) and Polit and Hungler (1999) welcome been use as a guide. This will assist in producing an unionized sub-headed piece of work. Title The surname of an term is the first part of a theme to be encountered and Parahoo (1997) situates that a entitle should steel water the readers attention to the precise argona of ascertain and make reference to the community from whom the selective information is collected. Cormack (2000) and Marshall and Kelly (2007) agree, stating a title should be concise and reflect the content of the vignette.The chosen clause is titled Perceived barriers and facilitators to tooling enquiry findings in the Irish practice setting. This title utilised by Glacken and Chaney is concise, consisting of 13 linguistic communication in bold print. Rumrill et al (2000) primary(prenominal)tain that a model length title is 12 15 words. all the same, the title does not reflect the population of the sampling root i. e. Registered Nurses. Although the title still provides insight into what the obligate is trying to accomplish. Author(s) According to Cormack (2000) look forers must be qualified to commence a esearch exact. The exploreers force and credentials in the article be clear stated and easy to find. They two have initials after their names, one of which has a PHD, which indicate that they have an educational earth. A search development Glacken and Chaney using the ProQuest database identifies several(prenominal) create articles by Glacken. According to Lo Biondo-Wood and Harber (2002) this enhances the credibility of a study placing confidence in the findings. The article was submitted for publication on the fore to the highest degree July 2003 and was accepted on the 9th January 2004.This illustrates that it was still relevantly recent and not dated when published which could have posed questions regarding validity and reliability. The journal of Clinical Nursing has published the article. This likewise adds to the credibility of the interrogation study, as all published articles ar double obligate peer brushuped. Abstract The intend of the move up is to provide a short countywide synopsis of a n article (Rumrill et al 2000). According to Parahoo (1997) it should quickly focus the readers attention on the main dapples of the study.Langford (2001) overly states that a well-presented pilfer should be accurate, self-contained and read adequate to(p). This lift gives a brief summary of the study and indoors the first few lines identifies what the study is trying to achieve to ascertain what registered nurses perceive as barriers to the utilisation of question findings and discover what they perceive would alleviate the implementation of these findings. The remainder of the abstract provides a summary of appeal (cross- fragmental survey), the population (registered nurses) and overall findings.One limitation say is that the interrogationers do not give the exact pattern sizing in the abstract. By indicant this summary it is believed that the reader would be able to make an informed choice round the relevance of the article for their purpose. The keywords used d eep down the abstract were barriers, clinical practice, facilitators, Republic of Ireland, utilisation. It is spanking that interrogationers read assign keywords for their articles in revise to aid publications searching through databases (Webb 2005).The keywords used by Glacken and Chaney are all relevant to the research study. Introduction The purpose of the introductory function is to clear localize the job and give a precept for the study been carried out (Cormack 2000). Poilt and Hungler (1999) agree by stating that the introduction should explain the research problem and why the study is fundamental, worthwhile and relevant. Russell (2004) also states that the introduction should thoroughly describe the background of the research problem so that the inquire for the study is apparent.The introduction given by Glacken and Chaney builds a cause from existing literary productions that the problem is of adequate value to cut unless research. The antecedent of thi s critique believes the research problem is in the last declare of the introduction. It states that there are umteen difficulties complex in achieving evidence based practice and m whatever barriers that whitethorn counteract research utilisation. If this is in accompaniment the research problem, the researchers observe with Russells (2004) recommendation that the research problem should advert directly from the introduction and conclude this component part.However one would feel that this introduction deals more with the enormousness of research rather than explaining that the remainder of the article will focus on the barriers that impede research. According to Cormack (2000) an introduction should also state the studys limitations. This particular introduction does not make the studys limitations explicit to the reader. Literature Review/ priming coat According to Parahoo (1997) a literature come off serves to put the current study into the linguistic con school text of what is already cognise more or less the subject.Cormack (2000) states that the literature come off is a critical review of previous literature relating to the research topic. and so this scratch aims to provide the reader with an at a lower placestanding of what the current state of evidence is in the selected area of study. This review is organized by heading that correspond to the key study concepts, which makes the review easy to follow. The researchers attempt to review previous studies relating to the topic, thus preparing the ground for pertly research. The studies presented highlight the significance of the problem under investigation.It was difficult to distinguish the exact research question, as there was no decided question asked. Although Valente (2003) states that abouttimes researchers may hold in the research question deep down the purpose of the study. The final statement of the literature review is therefore the purpose of this study it is well-ti med(a) that perceived barriers are identified and ac noesisd. and then as you read the review it moves from giving to specific relevance with the last share of the review clearly outlining the motive for the study. due to the article been published in 2004, it is expect that the references used will be relevantly recent.From reading the reference list, it can be seen that this is the case and only three references onwards 1994 have been used. There was a need for these older references as the original author who assiduous the Barriers dental plate did so in 1991 and the purpose of the 1978 reference was to illustrate that access code to research reports has been a problem for umpteen years. Also noted is that the articles included in the reference list are clearly tie in to the topic under study and include international resources, all breast feeding related. http//repository. uwc. ac. a/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10566/308/RoweBlendedLearning2012. pdf? sequence=3 Method Acc ording to Polit and Hungler (1999) the heart of the research critique is the analysis of the methodology decisions adopt in addressing the research question. Cormack (2000) suggests the method section should clearly state the research approach to be used and asks whether the method is appropriate to the research problem and whether the strengths and limitations of the approach are stated. Although not written in text it is clearly insinuateed out that the article is of a quantitative approach.Burns and Groves (1997) describe quantitative research as a method used to authorize more information, test relationships and uses numeric data to answer problems. In reviewing the methodology section which is under the subheading Methods, the researchers clearly demonstrate that the purpose method is a cross sectional survey using a non probability savour. According to Polit and Hungler (1999) a cross sectional design involves the appeal of data at one point in time. This descriptive study uses the conventional 29 item Barriers 5 point Likert scale, after firstly gaining permission from the main author to employ the instrument S.Funk. Therefore a strength of this article is related to the measurement tool. The researchers used an already unquestionable measurement device in which the reliability of the tool would have been determined. They reinforce this fact by saying that the scale is recognized to be psychometrically robust. A further quantitative research tool a questionnaire, was selected as the method to solicit opinions regarding the barriers to research. Cormack (2000) believes that questionnaires are the most widely used method of collecting data.However he recognises that if participants are aware that they are partaking in a study, it is natural that they expertness alter their response the Hawthorne Effect (Cormack 2000). The researchers do not state how they minimised this Hawthorne Effect. In rise to power to the questionnaire, a demograph ic information rag was utilised. This is in line with a descriptive design, as the purpose of such is to gain more information about the characteristics of a group (Vitale 2003). The research participants were a appliance sample of registered nurses who enrolled in a treat focused academic course in Trinity College, Dublin.All who enrolled were invited to participate in the study. However the recruitment process is not depict in much detail. It is not until the Findings section that the size of the sample is revealed 169 participants responded. According to Thompson (1999) the sample size in quantitative research is preferably a large sample. Vitale (2003) states that the frequent rule regarding sample size is sample error decreases as sample size increases. It is harder to generalise a sample of this size. It is value by the researchers in the Discussion section that the particular mode of sampling employed may introduce bias into the findings.This may result in the findings becoming less reliable. A limitation noted in the method design used by the researchers was the lack of an explicit framework. The researchers did not identify if they used one. When researching the other studies that used the Barriers scale the vast studyity used a framework. Ethical Consideration Ethics is an important part of nursing and nursing research. It is about researchers doing what is fair, decent and moral and is underpinned by determine and believes of the community (Crookes and Davies 2004).There is no designated section allocated to honourable considerations, however Hek (1996) states that estimable issues may be integrated throughout the article. This article addresses respectable issues in twain the abstract and under the method section. The researchers clarify that the ethical issues of a persons properly not to be harmed, right of full disclosure, right of self-determination, right of concealment and confidentiality were respected. According to the resear cher all participants provided their live with to the study by the returning of the effected questionnaire.Consent is vital as it respects the self-reliance of individuals, their right to privacy and their right to choose (Tingle and Cribb 2002). Results Cormack (2000) states that the results should be presented clearly and in rich detail so that the reader is able to measure how reliable the findings are. Polit and Beck (2004) agree by stating that the most critical element of any study is getting your results across and silent by your readers. Valente (2003) believes that the researchers should repeat the research question before delving into the findings.The researchers in this case presented the data in succinct form with teensy-weensy discourse at the start, but place their findings under subheadings. According to Russell (2004) researchers frequently organise their findings by research question to facilitate readability. The aim was to quantify the barriers to researc h implementation. The authors of this article present their findings systematically, utilising a variety of graphs and tables. record 1 shows a graph line drawing that 38% of the participants consulted journals more than twice a month.Table 1 presents the barriers to research utilisation in descending order of importance. Results were also explained and summarised aboard which according to Clifford (1997) is a form of descriptive statistics. According to Russell (2004) if a descriptive design was used the reader should find descriptive statistics such as mean, mode, median and standard deviation. All these statistics are included within the results section. The target audience (professional nurses) are more than likely to be able to transform the figures within each table and, thus, judge hoe reliable the results are.It is important that results are presented in such a focussing that they are clearly understood (Cormack 2000). Parahoo (1997) is an exhort of comparing results wi th other similar studies. The researchers pick out this style and examined the top 10 barriers with those instal in three recent studies (Table 3). The researchers showed their findings to be real similar with the studies undertaken in both Northern Ireland and Australia. Discussion/Conclusion The dissertateion section should flow from the data results and place the studys findings in context with what is already known (Parahoo 1997).Valente (2003) believes that under this section the researchers should summarise their major findings and conclude their application to practice, research, and theory and knowledge development. The researchers state that this section will discuss the findings in comparison with other studies undertaken. Valente (2003) states that author(s) should compare and contrast their results with other studies and interpret the findings. The news is unambiguous and supported by the results obtained. over again the researchers used subheadings to ease readab ility. There are many implications to practice identified by the researchers.According to Valente (2003) implications should describe how the results of the study could be utilize to nursing practice. For example the researchers discovered that their study and many other studies identified nurses perceived lack of authority as the most common barrier to research. Therefore they uncovered a need to implement some change into the organisational setting. Also, more support from managers was noted to be the top class-conscious facilitator of research implementation. The researchers also suggest a further research study, which would explore the reasons why nurses do not access research journals on a regular basis. General ImpressionOverall the article was interesting with clear aims and use of methodology. It was sooner simple to interpret and has provided interesting fact regarding this topic. The study contains few flaws and represents a valid example of descriptive quantitative res earch. The results have addressed the aims of the study and are both informative and descriptive. It is recommended that it should contain a section of ethical consideration however the ethical issues are evident throughout the article. In the introduction the article stresses the importance of research in nursing and health care. This builds a good case for continuing the study.Research is an inwrought part of every nurses role. But as this study revealed there are many barriers for nurses to overcome to properly utilise and implement research. This study has brought these barriers to the foreground and identified ship canal to overcome them. The findings were interesting, although it might become more reliable if the study was replicated using a larger, random sample group. The top ranked barrier to research utilisation was affect to read, as it was made known to be nurses perceived lack of authority. The article was very good overall and a striation of interesting facts emerge d from the study. References