Compare and contrast the writing styles Essay

Writers are characterized by three factors. These factors are title, spook, and theatrical role. William Byrd and William Bradford were two compound writers however they took completely opposite approaches toward piece of pen. During these times, journals, diaries, and sermons make up the literature. Byrd and Bradford were no exceptions with their full treatment of A History of the Dividing Line and Of Plymouth Plantation respectively. Whether it was the difference in writing styles, the different purposes for writing the stories, or simply each writers tad, their techniques were far from similar to one an otherwise.One difference between Bradford and Byrd was their writing styles. Bradford used the plain style to record and to describe his accounting system of the bracing World. Plain style writing is the form of writing used by the Puritans. This writing style tended to stay a representation from figures of speech and tried to encumber it plain, simple and right to the po int. A great example is when the settlers first arrived and Bradford historied that the slew had now no friends to welcome them nor inns to entertain or remember their weather-beaten bodies no houses or oftentimes less t take ins to repair to, to try on for succor (31). This statement explained how difficult it was to arrive to such a bare(a) land even after all the hardships assail. Bradford did an splendiferous job in his writings to give the real and accurate accounts of what happened.On the other hand, Byrd wrote his perception of the New World in sharp short letter to the writing style of Bradford. Byrd used forms of ridicule to record his account of what took place in the fresh colonies. A classic example of this technique was when Byrd called the sudden immigration of people to the New World a modish frenzy (50). This statement shows that Byrd scene it to be just a ripe fad to start a life in the New World. Byrd wrote using his own perception of colonial life and s truggle, therefore making it less historically accurate than Bradfords writings. These two styles characterized each man and greatly attributed to the huge contrast in their writing preference.One of the three factors that characterized both writers was purpose. A large contrast in the writings of Byrd and Bradford was the purpose for which they were written. The main reason that Bradford wrote his story was to swear the reader about the hardships and struggles of Puritan life in the NewWorld. He also wrote his story to show Gods hand in their experiences. Many Biblical references to God such as, but they cried unto the Lord, and He comprehend their voice and looked on their adversity (31), were used in his writing for this truly reason. This as well as many other religious references showed how much of an impact religion had on the Puritans. Bradford wanted to convey this dependence on and impact of God and religion throughout his writings. Byrds writing was to a greater extent biased and opinionated because he wrote it to amuse the reader.Read Also Topics for liken and Contrast EssayFor example, all throughout his story he constantly made fun of settlers. He mentioned during the story that the settlers built a church building that be no more than fifty pounds and a tavern that cost five hundred (52). This little tidbit served no purpose other than to criticize the colonial settlers and had no historical significance whatsoever. He made fun of the settlers to explicate change in the settlers way of life. Bradfords purpose greatly contrasted with that of Byrd.The last contrast between Byrd and Bradford was their attitude or dance step towards the subject they wrote about. In Of Plymouth Plantation, Bradford used a serious intent. His tone remained simple and unbiased throughout the story. The fact that he chose to use this tone is because Bradford was a truly religious man that closely followed the Puritan way of life. Most of all, he wanted to re cord the true accounts of what took place without coalesce soulfulnessal thoughts or ideas with fact. On the other hand, Byrd used a very satirical and humorous tone. This satirical tone was conveyed throughout his entire story.An excellent example of satirical writing was when Byrd explained how colonists were too lazy to plant their own crops, so instead they were forced to take more pains to taste for wild fruits in the woods than they would have taken in till the ground (52). This quote by Byrd clearly showed his frustration with the colonists very. Byrds tone differed from Bradfords, because Byrds story was never meant to be an accurate historical account of colonial times. Byrd possessed different feelings toward matters that took place, and this dramatically changed his tone.To conclude, writers are never the same. on that point are many different types of writers all across the world, from ancient to modern times. William Byrd and William Bradford were no exception t o this. Their style, tone, and purpose totally changed the outcome of their writings which were ground upon similiar incidents in history. People have their own views and beliefs of a certain situation, and more often than not, that view will be different from person to person as clearly shown in comparing Byrd to Bradford.